There are many reasons:
1) Safer neutral camps in general, often on higher ground than their dire counterparts
2) Easier to go jungle in between creep waves if you're mid
3) If you're an offlaner you can actually pull for your needs
4) Radiant's side is actually more visually intuitive
5) Safer lanes, generally harder to gank
6) Offlaner has direct and generally very safe access to secret shop
After about 30-40 minutes, however, this advantage seems to dissipate, so it seems Radiant mostly has early/mid game advantage, while I am not sure it stands for late game too.
Cus u cant cuddle with tree people if ur dire
And its easier to defend as radiant due to that usual warding place on the hill jungle near tier 2 bot and mid
I feel comfortable as dire and have a higher winrate with it
Radiant: 53.77%
Dire: 56.03%
guess i can play in both sides i have 52.09% dire and 52.93 radiant from 6.2k games :D
P.S: 3.5k games dire, 2,7k games radiant
radiant side = better players
if you have a winstreak that means you will be dire side player for a lose. im an account booster and i have tons of smurf accounts. after %80 win rate you will be always at dire side for win rate balance
because a lot of people used to play dota 1 and it is better to be in the same side with host (radiant side now).
Radiant:
4.
a. Showing or expressing vitality or joy: radiant eyes; a radiant smile.
b. Splendid; glorious: radiant beauty; a radiant future.
Dire:
causing or involving great fear or suffering; dreadful; terrible:
a dire calamity.
2.
indicating trouble, disaster, misfortune, or the like:
dire predictions about the stock market.
3.
urgent; desperate:
in dire need of food.
Coincidence... I think not. kappa
same here
idk for me maybe because i'm used to playin as radiant
or visually better like when you in radiant you will push/move up but in dire you will push down or going down
it felt like in radiant you moving forward but in dire you going backward.........XD
dire has a tiny "objective gaming" advantage (e. g. rosh, bot and top lane farm/xp, jungle, ancients). that though isnt used effectivly by most players.
radiant has other advantages (e. g. ez warding, mid lane).
Remember ti5 finals: EG picked 2 times sides over first pick and took Dire from CDEC, which was one (of many) factors why EG won ti5.
I got higher winrate on Dire 68% while Radiant 60%
@rick666morty
This account so far is my best smurf account. After 2 smurfs I calibrated just 3.5k MMR.
Veuillez vous connecter pour publier un commentaire.
Hello, wanted to ask why does dire fraction has lesser winrate than radiant according to my profile, my friends even some of the pro players.
If it is still foggy for you I meant that my radiant winrate is 55% and dire is 49%.
Let's say dendi, he have 58.55% radiant winrate, 56.39% dire winrate.
Is there something dire is lacking than radiant side to have such winrate, camps? ward spots? more ganking potencial?